Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging ; 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1800348

ABSTRACT

In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, myocardial injury and echocardiographic abnormalities have been described. The present study investigates cardiac function in COVID-19 patients 6 weeks post-discharge and evaluates its relation to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Furthermore cardiac function post-discharge between the first and second wave COVID-19 patients was compared. We evaluated 146 patients at the outpatient clinic of the Leiden University Medical Centre. NYHA class of II or higher was reported by 53% of patients. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to assess cardiac function. Overall, in 27% of patients reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was observed and in 29% of patients LV global longitudinal strain was impaired (> − 16%). However no differences were observed in these parameters reflecting LV function between the first and second wave patients. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction as assessed by tricuspid annular systolic planar excursion (< 17 mm) was present in 14% of patients, this was also not different between the first and second wave patients (15% vs. 12%;p = 0.63);similar results were found for RV fraction area change and RV strain. Reduced LV and RV function were not associated with NYHA class. In COVID-19 patients at 6 weeks post-discharge, mild abnormalities in cardiac function were found. However these were not related to NYHA class and there was no difference in cardiac function between the first and second wave patients. Long term symptoms post-COVID might therefore not be explained by mildly abnormal cardiac function.

3.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 203(9), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1277571

ABSTRACT

Rationale: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, rapid and accurate detection of infected individuals is crucial to control further spread. Electronic nose (eNose) technology is an emerging diagnostic tool for diagnosis and phenotyping of a wide variety of respiratory diseases. Hence, the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis by eNose was assessed for the discrimination between individuals with and without a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This was a prospective real-world study of individuals (≥18 years of age) presenting to a public testing center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, August 2020 for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Baseline breath profiles were obtained using the SpiroNose [1,2], a cloud-connected eNose, after sampling of a combined throat and nasopharyngeal swab. A SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as a positive molecular amplification test at baseline and/or ≤7 days after inclusion. Data-analysis involved advanced signal processing, ambient correction and statistics based on independent t-tests followed by linear discriminant and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis [2]. The accuracy of the diagnostic model based on eNose sensor data was subsequently assessed in an independent validation set and in a replication set including newly presented individuals to the testing facilities in November 2020. Results: 1808 individuals with (n=68) and without (n=1760) SARS-CoV-2 infection were included, divided in a training (n=904) and validation (n=904) set. The eNose sensors were combined into a composite biomarker with an ROC-area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.929-0.967) in the training set. These results were confirmed in the validation set (0.957;CI:0.942-0.971) and externally validated in a replication set with newly presented individuals (n=1089) with (n=151) and without (n=938) SARS-CoV-2 infection (0.935;CI:0.921-0.952) (Figure 1). A SARS-CoV-2 infection percentage score of 0.30 selected from the training set resulted in 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity in the validation set indicating that in 75% of individuals SARS-CoV-2 infection could have been reliably ruled out (0% false negative). In the replication set, the score resulted in 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Conclusions: Exhaled breath analysis by eNose can reliably distinguish between individuals with and without a SARS-CoV-2 infection in public health setting. This quick and non-invasive method can therefore be used as a screening instrument, eliminating the need for additional time-consuming, stressful, and expensive diagnostic tests. Thereby the number of required SARS-CoV-2 molecular amplification tests can be reduced by more than 70-75%. [1]de Vries R, Sterk PJ. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 [2]de Vries R, Muller M, et al. Annals of Oncology 2019 .

4.
EClinicalMedicine ; 32: 100731, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Short-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients reveals pulmonary dysfunction, myocardial damage and severe psychological distress. Little is known of the burden of these sequelae, and there are no clear recommendations for follow-up of COVID-19 patients.In this multi-disciplinary evaluation, cardiopulmonary function and psychological impairment after hospitalization for COVID-19 are mapped. METHODS: We evaluated patients at our outpatient clinic 6 weeks after discharge. Cardiopulmonary function was measured by echocardiography, 24-hours ECG monitoring and pulmonary function testing. Psychological adjustment was measured using questionnaires and semi-structured clinical interviews. A comparison was made between patients admitted to the general ward and Intensive care unit (ICU), and between patients with a high versus low functional status. FINDINGS: Eighty-one patients were included of whom 34 (41%) had been admitted to the ICU. New York Heart Association class II-III was present in 62% of the patients. Left ventricular function was normal in 78% of patients. ICU patients had a lower diffusion capacity (mean difference 12,5% P = 0.01), lower forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity (mean difference 14.9%; P<0.001; 15.4%; P<0.001; respectively). Risk of depression, anxiety and PTSD were 17%, 5% and 10% respectively and similar for both ICU and non-ICU patients. INTERPRETATION: Overall, most patients suffered from functional limitations. Dyspnea on exertion was most frequently reported, possibly related to decreased DLCOc. This could be caused by pulmonary fibrosis, which should be investigated in long-term follow-up. In addition, mechanical ventilation, deconditioning, or pulmonary embolism may play an important role.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL